SAS - Painting Techniques & Palitoy History
Posted: 05 Jul 2014 14:47
Working through the my pile of figures, something struck me - there are 2 painting techniques used on the SAS figures, and that these may be variant specific - so I explored further.
1) The strong yellow paint is applied to the black plastic directly. This is the more vibrant and hard-wearing of the two, and is still good and intact 30 years later. I have named this Superior Paint.
2) The second technique involves applying a base coat of grey to the black plastic and then applying a second coat of yellow over the top. This is not particularly hardy, and wears/fades easily, going through pale yellow, grey/white, and then to complete absence. I have named this Inferior Paint.
There seems to be no correlation between the inferior and superior paint types and the two types of plastic (hard, associated with Type 2 or Second Wave figures, and the softer, associated with the Type 1), as I have Superior Paint on both types.
Superior is associated with Flat Hand Commandos (Types 3 and 4), and thus with the darker facial features – the darker/thicker eyes and eyebrows. Inferior is associated with round hands, and lighter facial features
In fact, overall, the Superior paint seems to be associated with the darker facial features, so my Beaver figure has Superior paint and dark features, as does my Type 2 Stakeout, but my Type 1 Stakeout (with Inferior paint) has lighter facial features. This correlation holds true in all of the examples I can come across (archive at BFTB and on ebay) but I have no idea if this is the case in general.
These darker features are the product of either a thicker paint, or thicker painting process or brush (actually, I have no idea how the eyebrows were applied!).
As I said in the SAS Pilot post, this is important in the history of AF.
Once again we are seeing two types of thing; variants in twos, moulding in twos, painting in twos. Always two, or multiples thereof.
I am starting to think that Palitoy used two factories, and that the differences between the two factories in terms of moulds, paint, etc. are causing a large amount of these variants.
1) The strong yellow paint is applied to the black plastic directly. This is the more vibrant and hard-wearing of the two, and is still good and intact 30 years later. I have named this Superior Paint.
2) The second technique involves applying a base coat of grey to the black plastic and then applying a second coat of yellow over the top. This is not particularly hardy, and wears/fades easily, going through pale yellow, grey/white, and then to complete absence. I have named this Inferior Paint.
There seems to be no correlation between the inferior and superior paint types and the two types of plastic (hard, associated with Type 2 or Second Wave figures, and the softer, associated with the Type 1), as I have Superior Paint on both types.
Superior is associated with Flat Hand Commandos (Types 3 and 4), and thus with the darker facial features – the darker/thicker eyes and eyebrows. Inferior is associated with round hands, and lighter facial features
In fact, overall, the Superior paint seems to be associated with the darker facial features, so my Beaver figure has Superior paint and dark features, as does my Type 2 Stakeout, but my Type 1 Stakeout (with Inferior paint) has lighter facial features. This correlation holds true in all of the examples I can come across (archive at BFTB and on ebay) but I have no idea if this is the case in general.
These darker features are the product of either a thicker paint, or thicker painting process or brush (actually, I have no idea how the eyebrows were applied!).
As I said in the SAS Pilot post, this is important in the history of AF.
Once again we are seeing two types of thing; variants in twos, moulding in twos, painting in twos. Always two, or multiples thereof.
I am starting to think that Palitoy used two factories, and that the differences between the two factories in terms of moulds, paint, etc. are causing a large amount of these variants.