Page 4 of 4

Re: FANG v HAWK

Posted: 14 Jan 2009 11:15
by SteveD
Sorry Baron - forgot to look - I'll see if can see them in there tonight.

Re: FANG v HAWK

Posted: 13 Feb 2009 18:26
by Quickfire
paul wrote:-
Red - Actions on

Amber/Yellow - Standby

- Go, Go, Go.

Twas ever thus. With much luv from the IA committee.



Quickfire, you've made 510 posts over the years.

Have ANY of them ever made any sense?!?!?

:doc: :doc: :doc:
To have faith is to believe in things you hope for,
To believe in things you cannot see.

On the other hand: f*ck or walk.

Or as someone once put it more benignly: are you a sponge? Or a stone?

:quick:

Re: FANG v HAWK

Posted: 13 Feb 2009 18:51
by redrage
Had a look at both my carded swordfish (is there a pleural for this) and neither have blueprints. Only stickers

A

Re: FANG v HAWK

Posted: 13 Feb 2009 23:55
by Andy1672
redrage wrote:Had a look at both my carded swordfish (is there a pleural for this) and neither have blueprints. Only stickers

A
Swordfishies ? Swordfishii ?

Re: FANG v HAWK

Posted: 14 Feb 2009 08:07
by Sundance
the plural of fish is fish. so multiple Swordfish would be Swordfish