Page 4 of 4
Re: Little and Large Continued
Posted: 18 Mar 2013 23:23
by Chopper
Yup, but not very naval. Maybe they just decided against a space ranger after the fact? I guess its possible they made them then decided to change their role. A Space Ranger would have been cooler.
Re: Little and Large Continued
Posted: 19 Mar 2013 08:24
by Thundershot
It was probably a case of Palitoy thinking to themselves we haven't got anything for the navy & delving into the parts bin.

's a much underappreciated figure who nobody seems interested in despite being one of the rarer
There's one on ebay presently, which has been re-listed at least 3 times already, not even making it's starting price of £1.99.
Re: Little and Large Continued
Posted: 19 Mar 2013 09:19
by SteveD
I'm always surprised more people don't army build the navy assault, ground & arctic. Or the series 1 in general. A crowd of the little buggers look great together!
Re: Little and Large Continued
Posted: 19 Mar 2013 09:24
by Chopper
Shhhh, or JIJ will hear you. I'd love to, I have a few and I'd like more but they usually go for good coin, sadly.
Re: Little and Large Continued
Posted: 19 Mar 2013 20:01
by Thundershot
SteveD wrote:I'm always surprised more people don't army build the navy assault, ground & arctic. Or the series 1 in general. A crowd of the little buggers look great together!
Yeah, from the first telly advert, you get the impression that Palitoy were pitching the idea of army building

figures from the get-go.
Mind you, how many parents in those days (or now for that matter) would of been prepared to splash the cash on two identical toys?
I know that if I'd of asked for a second Stormtrooper Mum's answer would of been: "No, you've got that one already!"